Producers Comment to Life Under a Windplant
As producer and director of
the documentary, Life Under a Windplant,
a video shown widely in your area, I'd like to respond to the spurious claims
about it wrought by your not-so-very local wind developer. But first, you
should know I'm a retired university administrator who has no financial
interest one way or another over this wind issue, nor do I nor any members of
my family own property in the viewshed of any
proposed windplant. On the other hand, wind
developers hope to make a financial killing, and, despite their penchant for
labeling opponents as NIMBYs, themselves live
hundreds of miles from their project. The industry is in fact a spiritual
descendant of Enron, the “energy” company that, before its demise, owned and
operated the nation's largest collection of wind facilities; its primary
function was to pioneer the tax shelter as a commodity. After several years of
researching this industry, I've concluded the relatively feckless energy it
produces is a front for the real business of generating Enronesque
tax avoidance schemes benefiting a few at the expense of many, while playing
havoc with the environment (while claiming to be saving it). It's an
environmental hoax and an economic sham.
About the video:
The
prices Somerset Wind in Pennsylvania paid for the properties were comparable with
prices
paid for similar properties in the area and in line with the price previous
buyers had paid. The original property owners were in the process of litigating
because of windplant-caused nuisances, inducing the windplant to head off the lawsuit quickly. The value of the
properties for tax assessment purposes was about 20 percent less than the its market value, a circumstance that obtains in virtually
every real estate transaction. And the reality is that both properties were
sold within the year at significantly less than the price Somerset Wind
paid—80 percent less to the property owner who originally leased land to
Somerset Wind and nearly 60 percent less for
the other property sold to a windplant employee. The
quotes of the prices listed in the documentary are those listed in the deeds.
And the reason the developer bought the properties in the first place was to
forestall a lawsuit brought on because of the very real nuisances that the windplant created--nuisances actually named in an
exculpatory easement in the new deeds. Your wind
developer's chutzpa here is simply amazing....
Moreover, the claim that the
windplant noise in the documentary was somehow rigged
is a damnable lie. If anything, the actual sound was muted in the documentary.
Note that the video several times indicates how far the recorded noise was from
the wind turbines. Because we anticipated what the wind flaks would say about
dubbing, we recorded the voice you hear over the sound, showing that one had to
practically shout to be heard nearly a
half mile from the windplant. You might also ask any
of the Meyersdale participants in the documentary whether they think the sound
was dubbed over or modified in any way. Or ask whether the wind developer puts
language in his leases holding his company harmless from a variety of
nuisances, included noise--at is the case in Berlin, Pennsylvania.
Wind
noise is generally much less in the summer and early fall than at other times
of the year, because the wind at these seasons often has a desultory
quality, typically blowing with much
less intensity. Higher frequency turbine- induced sound along valley ridges is
often a hit or miss affair—some get assaulted by it while others hear nothing.
We recorded the noise in January. However, it is the low frequency noise that
is the real culprit. This is expensive to document. But
nonetheless very real. This is what Rodger Hutzell
in Meyersdale experiences. Finally, ask your wind developer whether he or his
staff are going to attend the “First International Conference on Wind
Turbine Noise” in Berlin, Germany this October 17-18—advertised with the banner
headline, “Wind Turbine Noise: Perspectives
for Control.”
The 340 foot tall turbines
near Berlin, Pennsylvania are four years old and I can't vouch for how they're
maintained. But I can vouch for their horrific noise. Ten miles down the road
at Meyersdale, the “newer” 376 foot Danish Micon
turbines make as much noise and, according to Meyersdale Wind's
fact sheet, these are indeed maintained by two employees. Similarly, a "new" windplant in nearby Thomas, West Virginia, also causes significant noise, and it, too, has
maintenance employees.
In Life Under
a Windplant, I
wanted to feature the human side of the problem with industrial wind, letting
the people and the images tell the story. It is the old story of
neo-colonialism, with distant capital exploiting the people and resources of Appalachia to give the illusion of progress. At the same time I wanted to show the
falsity of several of the many outrageous claims the wind industry continues to
make in pursuit of profit. No negative consequences seem to attach to the
industry for making a cascade of promises that unlikely will be fulfilled, such
as providing significant new jobs and local revenues while contributing to US energy independence; such as improving air quality
by reducing current levels of fossil fuel combustion; such as causing no
nuisances and actually enhancing nearby property values. What, for example,
would the penalty be in Vermont
if the wind developer's promises about the amount of local taxes a community
would receive failed to materialize because of an arcane legal tax offset known
only to skilled accountants? Or would
scores of thousands of homes really be “powered” by an energy source that at
best functions less than 30 percent of the time?
Those who would like to know
more about these issues, please visit the website I helped create: www.stopillwind.org. Or go the the Maryland
Public Service Commission website, type in Case No. 9008, and read my 40-page
direct testimony, with many documenting attachments, which I submitted as an intervenor in a Maryland windplant
application. Above all, please remember
that if something seems too good to be true, it almost always is.
Sincerely,
Jon Boone
503
East Alder Street
Oakland, MD 21550
301-334-3840